FOOD FOR THOUGHT
 

The BBC on-line on Friday 6 November 2015 carried a Viewpoint: 'The supermarkets' guilty secret about unsold food' which you could quite justifiably say gives much food for thought ...

Supermarkets are discarding hundreds of tons of food every year. What can be done to stop it, asks Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall.

At the Unity Youth Centre in Toxteth, Liverpool, chef Craig McKenzie rustles up free hot meals for a hall full of hungry children who've just put in a hard day at school.

What makes his job particularly satisfying is that he's cooking with ingredients that would otherwise have gone to waste. There is nothing wrong with the food he's using - it's all good, fresh stuff - but it has been rejected by supermarkets.

These ingredients - including quality fruit, veg and meat - haven't even made it to the shelves. They've been turned away before they get to the stores because there simply isn't space for them. Overproduction, it turns out, is the very cornerstone of our whole food retail system. And it comes with a massive side-order of waste.

It was great to watch those kids tuck into their dinner. But the sorry truth is that the food being put to good use in this way represents only a tiny fraction of the surplus generated by British supermarkets every day.

FareShare is the charity that redistributes this food to the Unity Centre, and many other groups serving community projects around the country. But chief executive Lindsay Boswell says the charity receives only 2% of the unsold, fit-to-eat food cast off by the food industry. The charity's aim is to secure 25% of it, enough to provide more than 1.5 million free meals a week to people who are in need.

Even if they achieve that goal, that still leaves an awful lot of perfectly good food unaccounted for. And that's all because the idea of running out of a product, or having shelves less than jam-packed, is absolute anathema to our supermarkets.

What's more, these big retailers are so big they can afford to sell only a proportion of "units" and discard the rest. Waste - hundreds of thousands of tonnes of it - is built into the system.

Yet if you look at many supermarket websites, you could be forgiven for thinking they don't have a waste problem at all. Many proudly announce that they send no food to landfill, for example.

But even if that's true, isn't it a bare minimum requirement? Hey, they're not dumping good food into a hole in the ground! Do they want a round of applause?

Donating food to charity is the "solution" that supermarkets want you to see, of course. But they can be a bit sketchy on the stats. Many don't give any detail at all about just how much of their unsold food is redistributed. The slippery phrase "where possible" comes up a lot. But as Lindsay Boswell at FareShare says, only a tiny portion of edible surplus food is being sensibly used.

If you try to find out what supermarkets do with the rest of their spare stock, you will come across much talk of "anaerobic digestion". This is an industrial process that uses micro-organisms to break down organic matter, producing a methane-rich gas which can be burnt to produce electricity. Sounds very neat and eco-friendly, doesn't it?

But anaerobic digestion (AD) is a red herring. Proponents say it's better than dumping waste in landfill. That may be so, but if that "waste" is edible food, it ain't saying much.

AD is a reasonable option for food that really is beyond being eaten - plate waste from the catering industry, for example. But making gas from good food is a very poor alternative to giving it to hungry people.

To most of us, that's obvious. Even if you look at it from a cold, hard economical viewpoint, it makes zero sense - AD recovers only a fraction of the energy available from food. If you or I eat it, we get all of it.

I've visited an AD plant and watched supermarket food "waste" being fed into the digesters. As a condition of filming, we agreed not to reveal the brands or supermarkets that were sending food here, or whether it was still edible. But let me say this, as a generality that's beyond dispute - much of the food going into these facilities is still fit for human consumption. It just shouldn't be there.

Supermarkets are using AD as an easy get-out clause, dodging responsibility for their huge waste footprint.

If you can chuck it all in a giant bacterial disappearing machine at the end of the day, the problem's solved, right? But it's not a truly sustainable solution - and certainly not a moral one. Retailers should be creating far less waste in the first place, and any food they produce that can be eaten by people should be eaten by people.

Why isn't it happening? Why aren't supermarkets sending more food to charities? Could it be because it involves a little effort and co-ordination? A few more man-hours, that aren't going to be reflected in the supermarkets' bottom line?

As the Morrison's website admits: "The redistribution of surplus food from stores presents a number of operational and food safety challenges."

But if the shocking scandal of supermarket food waste is to be dealt with, these are challenges that absolutely must be met. And they can be - it's Morrison's, in fact, that have now made the boldest move towards that goal, recently committing to sending all their unsold food to charities.

I applaud this step - even if it did come just 48 hours before my BBC programme, Hugh's War on Waste, questioned Morrison's commitment to dealing with waste. But "all" is a big word. Does it include all the surplus food in their distribution centres? All the fresh produce piled up on farms - the perfectly edible but slightly imperfect fruit and veg that doesn't match the supermarket's "cosmetic standards" that I wrote about last week?

How do we hold our major supermarkets to account? What's going to make them really step up and address this crazy waste once and for all? Well, one thing I've learned from making my series is that our big food corporations are not afraid of me (though I don't think I'm their favourite person right now).

But they are afraid of you - their customer. And if you insist that they deal with waste - because if they don't, you'll shop at another supermarket - then they will.

We've created a website that makes it a cinch to get your message across. There's a letter I've composed to supermarkets, asking them to stop wasting food, right now. It heads off all the excuses and weasel words that have allowed our retailers to bluff you into thinking they have this problem covered - because believe me, they haven't. All you need to do is fill in your details, tell us which particular supermarkets you shop at, and we'll make sure they get the message.

Every voice raised takes us a step closer to winning the war on waste